Paramount‘s Chief Legal Officer Makan Delrahim said that “everything is on the table” when it comes to finding a resolution to state attorneys general’s lawsuit seeking to block the proposed merger with Warner Bros. Discovery.

At a Politico conference on Tuesday, Delrahim also defended the company’s raising of the prospect that it would leave the state, amid reports that CEO David Ellison raised the prospect if no settlement was reached by Oct. 1. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is leading the state AGs lawsuit and appeared at the same conference hours earlier, called the threat to leave a form of “blackmail.”

“David Ellison was born here, lived here since I moved to this country. I’ve lived here. He’s raising his children here. His intent is to be committed to be in California,” Delrahim said. “There’s a point at which where you have a duty, a fiduciary duty to your shareholders, and those are all the factors you consider. But our goal is to be here.”

He added, “I heard the attorney general say that this was some kind of blackmail attempt for the lawsuit. It is not. When the delay starts costing you know after this merger has been approved from, I believe, 67 countries — European Union, China. Canada, Australia — let’s forget about the DOJ — but all of them have reviewed it this way. But this state seems to view this merger in a different market. You have to take a look at the business environment and look to see what’s best for not only the community, the business, and ultimately, go to the place where you are wanted.”

Ellison told a group of the company’s executives that he would start the process of leaving the state if Bonta did not negotiate a settlement.

California and 11 other states sued to block the merger last month, claiming that it would stifle competition for wide release theatrical film distribution, anticipated big budget blockbusters, and basic cable television channel licensing.

Paramount faces paying a $7 million-per-day ticking fee to Warner Bros. Discovery for each day that the merger doesn’t close past Sept. 30. But a federal judge last week set the trial for next March, and the deal expires in June. After that, Paramount would be on the hook for a $7 billion break up fee.

Delrahim also said that he takes Bonta “at his word” that the state AG lawsuit is not about control of CNN, amid fears that the Ellisons would look to move the network into a Trump-friendlier direction.

Ellison, Delrahim, “wants to bring it back to news,” as he pointed to the CEO’s op ed last week in The New York Times. In it, Ellison wrote that news organizations require independence, while he said that CNN and CBS News, which Paramount already owns, “are here to tell it straight down the middle.”

Even though Ellison claimed that the lawsuit was about opposition to his control of CNN, Bonta denied it, and said that merely divesting the news network would not be a settlement.

“I take him at his word. It’s not about CNN,” Delrahim said. “This is an antitrust case. He’s trying to protect movie theaters and cable operators, as alleged in the lawsuit.”

But Delrahim predicted that the AGs didn’t have a viable case. He pointed to support for the merger from major exhibitors, and when it came to the merger’s impact on cable operators, “it will fall apart because of the market definition.”

“There is no such thing as basic cable anymore,” he said. “Combined, if you look at streaming, the two companies will have something like 7% to 11% of the market share.”

That said, as Politico’s Alex Burns pressed him on the prospect of selling CNN as a way to “make it easier to get this deal done,” Delrahim said, “I was born in Iran. I moved here after the 1979 revolution. The single most important thing we have is the First Amendment. not because I’m a religious minority and …think people should be free, but also the First Amendment and free speech. If you start using state powers and wrap yourself around that to actually violate the First Amendment and control of content, that would be the saddest day in this country.”

He added, “But having said that, everything is on the table. We would be delighted to engage and discuss about any resolution to get this merger, to get this closing after all this time, in order to repair the industry, create more jobs, bring more jobs and production back.”

Get our Breaking News Alerts and Keep your inbox happy.

Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, and don't get your facts wrong.

Δdocument.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );