ABC Tells Judge That Donald Trump’s Regulatory Threats Continue To Chill Its Speech, But Network Faces Jurisdictional Hurdle In FCC Lawsuit

A federal judge heard arguments on Tuesday in ABC‘s First Amendment lawsuit against the FCC, with the network’s attorney arguing that the Trump administration’s threats to its broadcast licenses have created an ongoing chilling effect.

The network sued the agency in August after it issued an order calling for its eight broadcast stations to submit to an early renewal proceeding. The highly unusual action that came after Donald Trump urged the FCC to revoke the network’s licenses, along with calls for Jimmy Kimmel to be fired and complaints about its news coverage, as well as warnings from the president’s FCC chairman, Brendan Carr.

“We are watching everything we do,” ABC’s lead attorney, Beth Wilkinson, told the judge during a two-hour hearing. She pointed to Trump’s call for the network to lose its broadcast licenses for not airing a speech in July, noting that it “brings out anger in the administration and retaliation from the agency.”

At one point, Wilkinson compared ABC’s situation to the French Revolution, with people forced on a guillotine, wondering if anything will come down. The threat of losing broadcast licenses, she said, its one of a “death penalty” for stations.

U.S. District Judge Loren AliKahn did not make a ruling, and asked the parties for additional submissions with deadlines through Oct. 14.

Amid a flurry of FCC investigations of the networks under Carr, ABC’s lawsuit is the first major media challenge to those regulatory threats since Trump returned to office.

The FCC is seeking to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing, among other things, that its early renewal order was tied to an investigation of Disney’s diversity, equity and inclusion practices.

A large portion of Tuesday’s hearing was devoted to a critical jurisdictional question the network must overcome first. The agency’s lawyers contend that the network first had to exhaust administrative remedies before bringing the litigation, and that such a challenge has to be brought before the D.C. Circuit, not the district court.

Asst. U.S. Attorney Dimitar P. Georgiev, representing the FCC, told the judge, that ABC is “a regulated entity being subjected to regulatory inquiry by its regulatory.” He said that after the FCC’s media bureau issued its order for early licenses renewals, ABC could have appealed to the full commission.

Wilkinson argued that the commission could still turn down the appeal, allowing Carr to hold up the proceedings for years and even months of uncertainty.

Wilkinson said that the network already has changed its consideration of coverage and content amid the FCC threats. Among other things, she pointed to the decision by The View to forgo clips of political candidates on the Hot Topics segment this cycle, out of concern that it will invoke FCC scrutiny because of the equal time rule. The agency launched an investigation in February after the show featured Texas U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico. The rule requires broadcasters to provide comparable time to rivals when they feature qualified candidates, but ABC has contended that The View has long fallen under an exemption for news programming.

Get our Breaking News Alerts and Keep your inbox happy.

Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, and don't get your facts wrong.

Δdocument.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );